Why ZERG?
Consumer Crypto is Broken
While institutions and the general public have broadly accepted things like Bitcoin and stablecoins, interest in what brought the adoption in the first place - onchain participation and speculation - has been in free fall. And for good reason.
Crypto has always had trouble with good UX. Speed of development has often superseded it in the name of rapid iteration. That used to be an accepted trade-off. It isn't anymore. The current user experience of consumer crypto is untenable.
What used to be a community-driven culture where projects could rise to greatness through the sheer will of the collective has devolved into a toxic, open-air battle royale. Crypto natives pass a bag back and forth between each other on new launches, and fresh market entrants are quickly and inevitably gobbled up as exit liquidity.
The only way to "win" is to adopt what once were complex multi-wallet strategies and transaction bundling to serially pump out tokens for maximum extraction. We say "once were" because these approaches have now been fully productized for mass consumption.
The industry has innovated itself into a meat grinder. You either play the extraction game until every drop of liquidity is gone, or you stop playing entirely.
So, the industry has created two concurrent problems:
Large holders with concentrated positions have no clean way to redistribute supply to their community
New token launches are plagued by predatory bundling and sniping, with no route for fair allocation that doesn't sacrifice creator incentives
If crypto ever wants to bring mainstream participation back, there needs to be a mechanism of fair participation that is also built for the attention economy.
Enter ZERG.
Last updated